Think; Pitch Black - then think; on ice: but better still - don't think!
Added 11/20/2009
Picture this - a group of seals with a sprinkling of sea lions thrown in just to beef up the macho quotient of the group, is preyed upon in icy cold seas by a progressively larger group of ravenous killer whales and many of the smaller mammals are played with, butchered and devoured by the marauding killers amid a feast of blood, gore and very squishy special effects. But a few hardy little beasts, though clearly terrified out of their wits get it into their heads that they can survive and even beat their attackers because this is their territory - they know places to hide that are (relatively) safe where they think they might be able to wait out the `orrible orcas!
Well, a similar scenario is put before us in this numbingly boneheaded effort. How long can the cute little seals hold out against the overwhelmingly powerful, devastatingly voracious, heart-clenchingly vicious, highly evolved killing machines waiting to tear them apart, gobble them up and, in a few cases, rip off their heads before consuming them: a few minutes; a couple of hours at the most? No! A full 30 days! I don't know about anyone else but I find it tricky doing anything more complex than manipulating my keys to unlock my front door if the temperature drops one degree below zero for a few hours in broad daylight let alone trying to do it at 15 below in total darkness with a group of crazed super sensitive, super fast, super powerful vampires, who can see in the dark, nearby, trying to rip my head off. Yeh, all right - it's a movie but come on - credit the audience with a bit of intelligence! Okay, maybe not.
Oh, and the ending? Simply laughable!
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
A Decent Film not without Holes
Added 10/19/2009
I avoided this movie for a long time as the previews just made it look all-around cheesy. It was better than I thought it would be, though not fantastic.
I certainly would not call this "the best vampire movie ever" as many others have.
It's a pretty stereotypical horror movie really. It even follows your usual formula for who lives and dies. The character who wants to run off and leave someone else behind to die is the one who dies himself and then you have your run-of-the-mill hero who sacrifices himself along with your troubled, but reliable-when-it-matters leading man and tough, gun-wielding blonde leading lady. Just the same as almost every other movie of this type.
The flaws in this film are: Wouldn't people eventually ask questions when every year an entire Alaskan town is wiped out in winter by a blood-sucking "fire"? I am assuming that the vampires have to eat at least once every year, so this would keep happening over and over. And where do the vampires buy all their business suits and silver moonboots? And why are they speaking the Mayan language from Apocalypto? And (the most important question) Why, oh why! Don't they actually drink any of the blood? They rip people's throats open and get as much of the blood as possible on the top of their own heads and they spill as much as they can all over the ground, but not one drop seems to ever get inside their fish-like, gaping maws.
My final note: The high-pitched screaming noise they make at every turn = very annoying.
Overall the movie is a solid C, possibly even a C-. It's watchable, sure, but it's certainly not the best movie you're going to see this Halloween.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
Real Vampires
Added 10/13/2009
One of the best vampire movies made (along with "Let the Right One In"). This is exactly how I would imagine vampires. Why would vampires mess around? They wouldn't. They would tear you apart and eat you. But at the same time, they can control their actions and plan things out.
This is also a cool portrayal of how a small group of vampires would survive...and get away with it...most of the time....
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
No integrity in the story or the acting.
Added 9/21/2009
Very truthfully, this movie had potential, but ended up sucking very hard.
I for one will point out if something doesn't make sense or if supposedly intelligent characters are repeatedly responding to impending doom and ungodly terror all DUI. I care about the set-up, whats at stake, the characters themselves (I always was facinated with the bad guys), and yes, the story. This is a mess and it's a shame. The premise rocks. It's so painfully obvious, how was this not already done years ago? You couldn't ask for a better setting. Dark, cold and isolated, as a previous reviewer pointed out. And I must say that some of the vamps looked eerie as hell. I couldn't rip my eyes away. Gorgeously evil, I mean really beautifully scary. A kind of deformed look with the eyes a bit too close together. Some of them looked normal like the boss vamp himself. Not so scary. But other than that it bit the dust. Just stupid as hell. Dumb moves by the heroes, vampires trying to be philisophical or just walking around hissing at each other (really annoying, the worst part of the whole deal). I wasted my money, watch it on t.v. Not kidding. Hit Amazon up for the graphic novels, much better. This adaption was a wasted effort. Sam Raimi strikes again.
1 out of 2 people found this helpful.
|
I'll Take My Blood On The Rocks
Added 8/30/2009
You'd think that at least one vampire would wise up and take advantage of the fact that Alaska spends many a day in the dark. As far as I am aware, no such fate has befallen the great northern state. Based on the comic miniseries of the same name, "30 Days of Night" gives us a good look at what might happen if a vampire and a few of his undead friends would sink their fangs into the Land of the Midnight Sun.
The film opens with the small town of Barrow, Alaska preparing for its month-long dive into darkness (hence the thirty days of night). Most of the town's citizens are heading for sunnier locations, but a select few stay behind and stick it out. In this small group is the local sheriff, Eben (Josh Hartnett). While everyone is getting ready to leave, he's busy investigating a number of strange criminal acts (burning of cellular phones, slaughtering sled dogs, etc.). As he digs deeper into his investigation, he arrests a stranger (Ben Foster) who begins to wax prophetic about someone or something coming and that no one will survive.
Also staying behind (due to missing her flight) is Eben's estranged wife Stella (Melissa George). She assists Eben in arresting the stranger and goes with the pair to the sheriff's station where Eben's grandmother and brother are.
As soon as the sun goes down, chaos reigns supreme. Eben goes to check on the local telephone office and discovers a brutal murder/decapitation. Scared, he heads back to town and warns those that stayed behind to hide in their homes. As it gets darker, more and more people begin to die. Soon the streets are filled with blood and snow as a gang of vampires feast on the townsfolk.
A few survivors of the initial attack (including Eben and Stella) hole up in an attic and make plans to survive for the next month. The rest of the film shows the small group attempting to stay alive by using their knowledge of the town and the brutal snowfall to their advantage. Along the way, a few other survivors are picked apart by the vampire group which is headed up by Marlowe (Danny Huston).
As supplies become scarce and time begins to wear on them, the survivors take more and more chances in order to stay alive. This leads up to an eventual standoff with the vampires. Who lives? Who dies? Who finally gets to see the rising sun? Watch "30 Days of Night" and you'll find out.
The film's premise is great. It takes a legendary creature and puts in the one place that gives it seemingly every advantage over its victims. Isolated, cold, and in complete darkness, the average human would find it hard to survive with limited resources in such environs. Throw in a gaggle of bloodsucking immortals and you've really got problems.
The film's special effects are very good as well. They are bloody, gory, and very realistic. The makeup department also did a very good job.
Josh Hartnett's portrayal of Eben was very believable. Unlike the untouchable heroes in many films, he reacts to the initial vampire attacks with fear and confusion. I actually felt for his character as he tried to make sense of his situation. Melissa George is fairly convincing in her role as well. Mark Boone Junior nearly steals the show as Beau Brower, an unlikely hero in the film.
Unfortunately, Steve Niles and Stuart Beattie's story drags along at times and lacks a really convincing enemy. Despite being the leader of the vampire gang and seemingly full of wisdom, Marlowe just isn't that scary. There's never a moment in this film where I looked at Danny Huston's character and thought, "There's no way they can stop this guy." Whether it was Huston's performance or the direction of Huston by David Slade, I felt that the weak villain was the film's greatest downfall.
Despite this, I still recommend "30 Days of Night." While it isn't the best vampire film out there, it is much more loyal to its wicked origins than many of today's modern vampires. In a time where most bloodsuckers are busy courting teen girls or hanging out at Fangtasia, it's nice to see some truly evil vampires make their way out of the darkness.
0 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
Think; Pitch Black - then think; on ice: but better still - don't think!
Added 11/20/2009
Picture this - a group of seals with a sprinkling of sea lions thrown in just to beef up the macho quotient of the group, is preyed upon in icy cold seas by a progressively larger group of ravenous killer whales and many of the smaller mammals are played with, butchered and devoured by the marauding killers amid a feast of blood, gore and very squishy special effects. But a few hardy little beasts, though clearly terrified out of their wits get it into their heads that they can survive and even beat their attackers because this is their territory - they know places to hide that are (relatively) safe where they think they might be able to wait out the `orrible orcas!
Well, a similar scenario is put before us in this numbingly boneheaded effort. How long can the cute little seals hold out against the overwhelmingly powerful, devastatingly voracious, heart-clenchingly vicious, highly evolved killing machines waiting to tear them apart, gobble them up and, in a few cases, rip off their heads before consuming them: a few minutes; a couple of hours at the most? No! A full 30 days! I don't know about anyone else but I find it tricky doing anything more complex than manipulating my keys to unlock my front door if the temperature drops one degree below zero for a few hours in broad daylight let alone trying to do it at 15 below in total darkness with a group of crazed super sensitive, super fast, super powerful vampires, who can see in the dark, nearby, trying to rip my head off. Yeh, all right - it's a movie but come on - credit the audience with a bit of intelligence! Okay, maybe not.
Oh, and the ending? Simply laughable!
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
A Decent Film not without Holes
Added 10/19/2009
I avoided this movie for a long time as the previews just made it look all-around cheesy. It was better than I thought it would be, though not fantastic.
I certainly would not call this "the best vampire movie ever" as many others have.
It's a pretty stereotypical horror movie really. It even follows your usual formula for who lives and dies. The character who wants to run off and leave someone else behind to die is the one who dies himself and then you have your run-of-the-mill hero who sacrifices himself along with your troubled, but reliable-when-it-matters leading man and tough, gun-wielding blonde leading lady. Just the same as almost every other movie of this type.
The flaws in this film are: Wouldn't people eventually ask questions when every year an entire Alaskan town is wiped out in winter by a blood-sucking "fire"? I am assuming that the vampires have to eat at least once every year, so this would keep happening over and over. And where do the vampires buy all their business suits and silver moonboots? And why are they speaking the Mayan language from Apocalypto? And (the most important question) Why, oh why! Don't they actually drink any of the blood? They rip people's throats open and get as much of the blood as possible on the top of their own heads and they spill as much as they can all over the ground, but not one drop seems to ever get inside their fish-like, gaping maws.
My final note: The high-pitched screaming noise they make at every turn = very annoying.
Overall the movie is a solid C, possibly even a C-. It's watchable, sure, but it's certainly not the best movie you're going to see this Halloween.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
Real Vampires
Added 10/13/2009
One of the best vampire movies made (along with "Let the Right One In"). This is exactly how I would imagine vampires. Why would vampires mess around? They wouldn't. They would tear you apart and eat you. But at the same time, they can control their actions and plan things out.
This is also a cool portrayal of how a small group of vampires would survive...and get away with it...most of the time....
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
