I know I have allies
Added 11/8/2009
Oh, I cannot tell you how my heart is so warmed by reading what my British cousins across the sea have written about this piece of cinematic crap. Amazon.UK even described it as "sufficiently intelligent," an indulgence from the land that invented the English Language, only to be rewarded by this crap. It's a good thing we know how to cross oceans with firearms, otherwise they would have killed us all by now.
Yet it has a "patriotic" tone and theme, and therefore we must be polite. Yes?
No. After the success of Saving Private Ryan, the screenwriter was directed to come up with something fast. It shows. If this trash was written in any more than 30 days, I`ll be shocked. Have you ever watched a film where you were so terribly embarrased for the actors on the screen that you actually slunk down in your seat so no one one could see the red on your face? Well, when I saw this film's debut in Connecticut, there wasn't a dry head in the house.
The origins of the American Revolution are mystery. Keep it that way. It is not a topic to delve in. It is not a two-bit screenwriter's business.
0 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
In Freedom's Cause
Added 10/20/2009
"The Patriot" does a masterful job of re-creating the horrors of war through the narrative of a South Carolina farm family swept up in the brutal backcountry warfare of 1780-1781. As a college freshman and history lover, I watched this film because I had received good recommendations for it from like-minded friends.
First, let me agree with everyone else who says that the film is not historically accurate. No Loyalist militia are depicted, giving the inaccurate appearance that the backcountry war was merely American militia versus British regulars; I have no idea what the final battle is supposed to be, because it's not Cowpens or Guilford Courthouse; and as another reviewer wrote, as far as I know, no French were present with the Americans during the southern campaigns, except for Savannah and Yorktown.
However, I disagree with those who dismiss the film because of its historical inaccuracy. Viewers of this movie should EXPECT some historical inaccuracies - after all, this is Hollywood, right? Even the "uneducated masses" should be aware of the fact that not everything in this historical drama, just like in any historical drama, is unquestionable textbook material.
I gave this movie 4 stars because of its emotional pull into the dark days of the Revolutionary War. I believe the best way to teach history is through fiction (through books and movies), because it helps readers to see that history was a real event involving real people who experienced real tragedies and triumphs of life (just like we do now. Nobody who watches this movie should walk away unappreciative of the blood and tears that were spilled in the effort to create this nation. This especially applies to the South Carolina backcountry, where neighbors fought invaders and each other in a life-and-death struggle their own backyards. I normally don't watch violent movies, so the bloody scenes in this movie were unnerving (e.g., an American soldier getting his head blown off by a cannonball - a bloody Benjamin Martin tomahawking an unseen British soldier to death) - but it definitely reinforced General William Tecumseh Sherman's message: "There's many a boy here today who thinks that war is glory, but boys, it is all hell." (No scene in the movie shows or lingers on an excessive amount of gore.) Reading from history textbooks can give us a sanitized and romanticized version of war; personally, I enjoy PBS's "Liberty Kids" series designed to pull middle school students into the Revolutionary War era. The downside of "Liberty's Kids" is that it romanticizes a violent and heart-rending period; movies like "The Patriot" help to counter-balance that impression with a much more realistic representation of the war.
I am African-American, so another negative aspect of the movie that I disliked was the watered-down representation of slavery presented in the movie.
Overall, however, I would recommend this film to emotionally mature viewers who want to get a glimpse of what life during the Revolutionary War was truly like. Just be sure to check a textbook or visit a national park to find out the true story after watching the film.
1 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
Things to come
Added 10/16/2009
Considering the climate today, I wonder if this is a preview of things to come in this country.There are lots of fed up people who are tired of having their country invaded by socialists and having more govt control shoved down their throats.
0 out of 2 people found this helpful.
|
The Patriot is best in blu-ray
Added 9/28/2009
There are a plethora of reviews of the movie, but my review is mostly a comparison of the BD vs DVD version. I won't discuss its historical accuracy.
The DVD version was good, but the BD version is the best version for home viewing.
Audio has wider imaging that takes viewers into the movie, rather than a distant observer: cannon and musket salvos fly from left to right, tools and objects ring with clang of old metal alloys or wood. Unlike Master & Commander, the dialog channel is good and is not drowned out by sound effects.
The BD transfer is bright and sharp, so background elements have far more detail. The BD version is a revolution in clarity. The texture of clothing, woods, equipment, and fields of soldiers in battle formation are rendered well and appear more real than CGI cartoons. By now, BD veterans are used to the ultra detail shown on actors faces: down to EACH stubble on faces, and pores on their skin. Unlike Troy, its clear many of the props and sets appear life like and made of 'real stuff' versus stucco or papier mache. Also, actor's makeup is less obvious if not invisible, compared to other DVD to BD transfers. While controversy may exists in the historical depiction of the story's facts, few dispute the costumes, sets, dialog and mannerisms typical of revolutionary period USA, maybe since the Smithsonian Institute were the historical consultants on the film.
2 out of 2 people found this helpful.
|
A Good Movie Made Better
Added 9/14/2009
It's amazing how a few additional minutes added to a film can really add to the context and enhance the story. The Extended version of The Patriot only adds a few minuets of time to the movie, but enhanced the story significantly. Others have already pointed out the scenes and the impact, but I can vouch for their accuracy. While I've watched The Patriot numerous times, it was like watching it for the first time. If you enjoyed the original, you'll love the new version even more.
1 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
I know I have allies
Added 11/8/2009
Oh, I cannot tell you how my heart is so warmed by reading what my British cousins across the sea have written about this piece of cinematic crap. Amazon.UK even described it as "sufficiently intelligent," an indulgence from the land that invented the English Language, only to be rewarded by this crap. It's a good thing we know how to cross oceans with firearms, otherwise they would have killed us all by now.
Yet it has a "patriotic" tone and theme, and therefore we must be polite. Yes?
No. After the success of Saving Private Ryan, the screenwriter was directed to come up with something fast. It shows. If this trash was written in any more than 30 days, I`ll be shocked. Have you ever watched a film where you were so terribly embarrased for the actors on the screen that you actually slunk down in your seat so no one one could see the red on your face? Well, when I saw this film's debut in Connecticut, there wasn't a dry head in the house.
The origins of the American Revolution are mystery. Keep it that way. It is not a topic to delve in. It is not a two-bit screenwriter's business.
0 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
In Freedom's Cause
Added 10/20/2009
"The Patriot" does a masterful job of re-creating the horrors of war through the narrative of a South Carolina farm family swept up in the brutal backcountry warfare of 1780-1781. As a college freshman and history lover, I watched this film because I had received good recommendations for it from like-minded friends.
First, let me agree with everyone else who says that the film is not historically accurate. No Loyalist militia are depicted, giving the inaccurate appearance that the backcountry war was merely American militia versus British regulars; I have no idea what the final battle is supposed to be, because it's not Cowpens or Guilford Courthouse; and as another reviewer wrote, as far as I know, no French were present with the Americans during the southern campaigns, except for Savannah and Yorktown.
However, I disagree with those who dismiss the film because of its historical inaccuracy. Viewers of this movie should EXPECT some historical inaccuracies - after all, this is Hollywood, right? Even the "uneducated masses" should be aware of the fact that not everything in this historical drama, just like in any historical drama, is unquestionable textbook material.
I gave this movie 4 stars because of its emotional pull into the dark days of the Revolutionary War. I believe the best way to teach history is through fiction (through books and movies), because it helps readers to see that history was a real event involving real people who experienced real tragedies and triumphs of life (just like we do now. Nobody who watches this movie should walk away unappreciative of the blood and tears that were spilled in the effort to create this nation. This especially applies to the South Carolina backcountry, where neighbors fought invaders and each other in a life-and-death struggle their own backyards. I normally don't watch violent movies, so the bloody scenes in this movie were unnerving (e.g., an American soldier getting his head blown off by a cannonball - a bloody Benjamin Martin tomahawking an unseen British soldier to death) - but it definitely reinforced General William Tecumseh Sherman's message: "There's many a boy here today who thinks that war is glory, but boys, it is all hell." (No scene in the movie shows or lingers on an excessive amount of gore.) Reading from history textbooks can give us a sanitized and romanticized version of war; personally, I enjoy PBS's "Liberty Kids" series designed to pull middle school students into the Revolutionary War era. The downside of "Liberty's Kids" is that it romanticizes a violent and heart-rending period; movies like "The Patriot" help to counter-balance that impression with a much more realistic representation of the war.
I am African-American, so another negative aspect of the movie that I disliked was the watered-down representation of slavery presented in the movie.
Overall, however, I would recommend this film to emotionally mature viewers who want to get a glimpse of what life during the Revolutionary War was truly like. Just be sure to check a textbook or visit a national park to find out the true story after watching the film.
1 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
Things to come
Added 10/16/2009
Considering the climate today, I wonder if this is a preview of things to come in this country.There are lots of fed up people who are tired of having their country invaded by socialists and having more govt control shoved down their throats.
0 out of 2 people found this helpful.
|
