The idea was good, but it could have been better.
Added 8/19/2003
I initially rented this movie because Kiefer Sutherland is in it, and I am a big Kiefer Sutherland fan. I was pleasantly surprised by the appearances of Michael Madsen and Dennis Hopper.While, the acting, I thought, was good, it was the screenplay/storyline that wasn't. I can feel this build up, but the movie never climaxed for me. It just built me up and then didn't really go anywhere with it. I don't blame the actors for this, as I think everyone really was good, it was just wasn't done as well as it could have been.
1 out of 2 people found this helpful.
|
The soundtrack was nice.
Added 12/27/2001
The only thing I like about this movies was the soundtrack. I expected more from this move with the actors that was in it.
1 out of 3 people found this helpful.
|
Amazing waste of talent!
Added 8/27/2000
Extraordinary! I would never have thought that it was (is) possible to take a bunch of A-list actors (ie. Hopper, Madsen, Hannah, Sutherland) and pair them with a director who usually has a knack for making cult faves (Hot Dog... the movie for instance) and come up with a bag of leftovers like this!I got the feeling that the director was high on speed and didn't sleep at all during production, just kept on stubbornly trying to imitate the stylings of Quentin Tarantino except without the novelty nor the talent. Do not waste your money on this.
1 out of 6 people found this helpful.
|
The idea was good, but it could have been better.
Added 8/19/2003
I initially rented this movie because Kiefer Sutherland is in it, and I am a big Kiefer Sutherland fan. I was pleasantly surprised by the appearances of Michael Madsen and Dennis Hopper.While, the acting, I thought, was good, it was the screenplay/storyline that wasn't. I can feel this build up, but the movie never climaxed for me. It just built me up and then didn't really go anywhere with it. I don't blame the actors for this, as I think everyone really was good, it was just wasn't done as well as it could have been.
1 out of 2 people found this helpful.
|
The soundtrack was nice.
Added 12/27/2001
The only thing I like about this movies was the soundtrack. I expected more from this move with the actors that was in it.
1 out of 3 people found this helpful.
|
Amazing waste of talent!
Added 8/27/2000
Extraordinary! I would never have thought that it was (is) possible to take a bunch of A-list actors (ie. Hopper, Madsen, Hannah, Sutherland) and pair them with a director who usually has a knack for making cult faves (Hot Dog... the movie for instance) and come up with a bag of leftovers like this!I got the feeling that the director was high on speed and didn't sleep at all during production, just kept on stubbornly trying to imitate the stylings of Quentin Tarantino except without the novelty nor the talent. Do not waste your money on this.
1 out of 6 people found this helpful.
|
The idea was good, but it could have been better.
Added 8/19/2003
I initially rented this movie because Kiefer Sutherland is in it, and I am a big Kiefer Sutherland fan. I was pleasantly surprised by the appearances of Michael Madsen and Dennis Hopper.While, the acting, I thought, was good, it was the screenplay/storyline that wasn't. I can feel this build up, but the movie never climaxed for me. It just built me up and then didn't really go anywhere with it. I don't blame the actors for this, as I think everyone really was good, it was just wasn't done as well as it could have been.
1 out of 2 people found this helpful.
|
The soundtrack was nice.
Added 12/27/2001
The only thing I like about this movies was the soundtrack. I expected more from this move with the actors that was in it.
1 out of 3 people found this helpful.
|
