Great Western
Added 1/7/2010
I saw this movie when I was 14. Now I'm 50. I saw it again after 36 years break. Amazingly, it's still playing well. Strongly recommended!
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
Well, I was in 8th grade...
Added 10/4/2009
...so what did I know?! I saw this movie when it came out in the theater in '69. I remembered it as being really good....ha! Yes, it is entertaining, but certainly not anything to take the least bit serious. Was it meant to be a comedy?! The cast pops from one locale to another faster than I can get anywhere in a car...one minute Monument Valley, next a wooded Black Hills-lookalike. Next, back in the desert. Those were some fast horses back then. Beautiful Indian gal-with nicely-done makeup and a Wonderbra. Beautiful white girl with nicely done makeup...and beautifully highlighted hair. In summation, what I'm trying to say is this movie is just plain dumb. The soundtracks from almost any movie made in the late 60's and most of the 70's are always hideous, but the "theme"-although sung very well by Jose Feliciano-was worse than most! Just too funny from start to finish.
0 out of 3 people found this helpful.
|
The Longest Day of Westerns
Added 9/12/2009
Dirty Gold
Summary
Gregory Peck plays a sheriff that stumbles upon a map to a lost city of gold. Omar Sharif is the bandit who forces Peck to lead him there, after Peck burns the map after committing it to memory. The hunt is on as more and more people are drawn into the quest. With Indians and danger at every turn, will Peck and Sharif find the treasure? Will they survive? Do we even care?
Mackenna's Gold (1969) was pushed out by Lee J. Thompson as a chance to do for the western what he did for war films with The Guns of Navarone (1961), make the ultimate super-western. He hired a huge cast of stars including Gregory Peck, Omar Sharif, Edward G. Robinson, and Eli Wallach. Columbia Pictures pored 14 million dollars into the production and the film was made.
Violence
Men are shot with arrows, killed with hatchets and shot with rifles and blood is visible many times. The film has a high body count even before the action packed finale. Peck and Sharif have a brutal fight on top of a cliff. A woman falls to her death (shot with a dummy, so the scene is very fake). Torture is implied at several points. We see a man who was blinded by Indian's eyes (fairly scary for little ones) and watch an arrow go through a horses neck (fairly realistic with plenty of blood). Keep in mind, however, that this is sixties blood and will probably not bother teens or adults.
Sexual Content
THERE IS NUDITY IN THIS MOVIE! After the group finds a water hole, an Indian girl and Omar Sharif go swimming naked. The woman is seen completely from behind and from the waist up from the front. Sharif is also highly visible during this scene.
Language
Scattered h-words and d-words that can be counted on one hand.
Viewed in a modern context, the film is fairly lack-luster. The plot is decent, but rather implausible and poorly developed. The special effects are occasionally good (as in the fight on the cliff between Peck and Sharif), but mostly poorly done, even for the time. The acting is good, but the characters are not well defined. Clint Eastwood wisely turned this film down, and maybe you should as well.
1 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
Another Sony Reissue Scam
Added 3/14/2009
Three stars for the film, NO stars for Sony.
Columbia Pictures released many of its classic films on DVD in double-sided, widescreen & pan-and-scan format. However, after Sony bought out the Columbia film library, it then proceeded to reissue them in SINGLE-SIDE, PAN and SCAN ONLY format WITHOUT CHANGING THE UPC CODE OR FRONT COVER ARTWORK. Mackenna's Gold is only one example of this.
So because online DVD sellers cannot separate the two versions by UPC code (and some list the wrong aspect ratio or none at all), people who buy these titles for the widescreen content are cheated. The only way to tell the difference is looking at the back cover AFTER receiving the DVD (and sometimes that's wrong too) or by playing it. This is deceptive practice at its worst.
If you're a widescreen fan, beware of any Columbia title released by Sony.
3 out of 3 people found this helpful.
|
A film pregnant of good intentions!
Added 2/17/2009
The main factor that one should remark around this movie resides in the best intentions to work out as a deserved homage to Erik von Stroheim's Greed (1924).
The ambition for gold as symbol of power and emblematic icon, permeates a good part of myths, tales and transcendental works (Wagner's masterpiece, for instance) when we have Alberich stating that he would change the possession of gold instead love.
But the best intentions (at least in this case) really fell down when an uninspired script and a very weak direction, twisted the story into simple fragments. The anecdote of the bad guy and the good guy who knows where the gold is supported by common places and untied episodes that seemed to serve as a huge introduction for the final sequence of the holy earthquake, as a clear warning the gold is part of the earth and so no man deserves to acquire it.
And so, we will watch an actor of the stature of Gregory Peck visibly disgusted with a script that simply doesn't resist the implicit transcendence of the portrait.
A majuscule disappointment.
1 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
Great Western
Added 1/7/2010
I saw this movie when I was 14. Now I'm 50. I saw it again after 36 years break. Amazingly, it's still playing well. Strongly recommended!
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
Well, I was in 8th grade...
Added 10/4/2009
...so what did I know?! I saw this movie when it came out in the theater in '69. I remembered it as being really good....ha! Yes, it is entertaining, but certainly not anything to take the least bit serious. Was it meant to be a comedy?! The cast pops from one locale to another faster than I can get anywhere in a car...one minute Monument Valley, next a wooded Black Hills-lookalike. Next, back in the desert. Those were some fast horses back then. Beautiful Indian gal-with nicely-done makeup and a Wonderbra. Beautiful white girl with nicely done makeup...and beautifully highlighted hair. In summation, what I'm trying to say is this movie is just plain dumb. The soundtracks from almost any movie made in the late 60's and most of the 70's are always hideous, but the "theme"-although sung very well by Jose Feliciano-was worse than most! Just too funny from start to finish.
0 out of 3 people found this helpful.
|
The Longest Day of Westerns
Added 9/12/2009
Dirty Gold
Summary
Gregory Peck plays a sheriff that stumbles upon a map to a lost city of gold. Omar Sharif is the bandit who forces Peck to lead him there, after Peck burns the map after committing it to memory. The hunt is on as more and more people are drawn into the quest. With Indians and danger at every turn, will Peck and Sharif find the treasure? Will they survive? Do we even care?
Mackenna's Gold (1969) was pushed out by Lee J. Thompson as a chance to do for the western what he did for war films with The Guns of Navarone (1961), make the ultimate super-western. He hired a huge cast of stars including Gregory Peck, Omar Sharif, Edward G. Robinson, and Eli Wallach. Columbia Pictures pored 14 million dollars into the production and the film was made.
Violence
Men are shot with arrows, killed with hatchets and shot with rifles and blood is visible many times. The film has a high body count even before the action packed finale. Peck and Sharif have a brutal fight on top of a cliff. A woman falls to her death (shot with a dummy, so the scene is very fake). Torture is implied at several points. We see a man who was blinded by Indian's eyes (fairly scary for little ones) and watch an arrow go through a horses neck (fairly realistic with plenty of blood). Keep in mind, however, that this is sixties blood and will probably not bother teens or adults.
Sexual Content
THERE IS NUDITY IN THIS MOVIE! After the group finds a water hole, an Indian girl and Omar Sharif go swimming naked. The woman is seen completely from behind and from the waist up from the front. Sharif is also highly visible during this scene.
Language
Scattered h-words and d-words that can be counted on one hand.
Viewed in a modern context, the film is fairly lack-luster. The plot is decent, but rather implausible and poorly developed. The special effects are occasionally good (as in the fight on the cliff between Peck and Sharif), but mostly poorly done, even for the time. The acting is good, but the characters are not well defined. Clint Eastwood wisely turned this film down, and maybe you should as well.
1 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
