The Haunting
Added 2/6/2010
Eleanor Lance is called to meet at Hill House for Dr. Marrow's sleeping disorder studies, along with three other people. The owners of the house tell them that no one will be around and that they won't be able to hear them. The first night they all sit around and talk. Eleanor tells them that her sleeping disorder is different because she can sleep it is just that she wakes up because she thinks her dead mom is still living with her. Well that isn't the case now because she is woken one night in the Hill House bedroom by talking childrens voices asking her for her help. At first scared by the voice, she learns to avoid them. Later, the group finds out that Dr. Marrow is not using them for sleeping disorders but a test in fear. The fear is first thought to be fake but eventually turns real when loud noises are heard and objects start to move. Now they must try an escape the house before they are all killed. I enjoyed it. The acting is good and there are moments that make you jump.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
The Humorous Haunting Of Humongous Hill House. A pointless remake of a classic
Added 1/6/2010
The Haunting is a movie originally made in 1963, based on Shirley Jackson's novel The Haunting Of Hill House. The story is about four paranormal investigators who spend time at Hill House, a 90-year old mansion in New England that is said to be haunted. During their stay, they find out over time that the house really is haunted. The house seems alive and it wants to keep one of the investigators, Eleanor, in the house.
Fast forward 36 years to 1999. A remake was made.
I watched this 1999 remake of The Haunting on YouTube from start to finish. I had never seen it before tonight. I definitely wasn't missing anything (except maybe Lili Taylor's good looks). This was a pointless remake of the classic 1963 original and it fails on all levels. Robert Wise got it right in 1963!!!!!!!!!!! This 1999 remake? It's equivalent to trying to remake The Wizard Of Oz. Better yet, I felt like I was watching an elementary school play called The Haunting, except the actors were adults. Don't mess with the classics, that's what I say. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Too often, the movie makers fall all over themselves when they remake classic movies. But we all know the real motivation behind the remake$. It's $$$$$. They always say it's to introduce the young people of today to old classic movies. My philosophy is this: Just show them the original!!!! But noooooooooo, they've got to throw in the CGI special effects, otherwise boredom will set in on the young audience. And they MUST be color movies. No black and white - that's a no-no.
What's wrong with this movie? EVERYTHING! This movie compared to the original is like comparing apples and oranges. First of all, the story was completely massacred. It's so different than the original, but every once in a while you'll hear a familiar line from the original. Very weird. Secondly, the movie is in color. Color isn't nearly as effective as black and white for this type of movie. Of course the movies of today are going to be in color, but if you're going to remake The Haunting at all, give at least SOME consideration to shooting in black and white. The acting for the most part is wooden. The actors in this 1999 movie don't come anywhere near the actors in the 1963 original in acting ability and screen presence. Catherine Zeta-Jones (who plays Theo) has an air about her that suggests that she thinks she's so sexy. This is the character she's playing. Unfortunately, she's not nearly as good as Claire Bloom from the original. Lili Taylor (who plays Eleanor) tries hard but falls short of the performance of Julie Harris. To me, Lili looks like a young Jamie Lee Curtis. Liam Neeson isn't nearly as good as Richard Johnson in the role of Dr. John Markway or whatever his name is in this remake. And he looks bored and totally out of place, like he's just going through the motions and collecting his paycheck. Owen Wilson is no Russ Tamblyn. Those pajamas are, well, funny. And what's with the "carnival" room that spins around? Hill House seems like it's a haunted attraction and an amusement park rolled into one. I'll stop there, because it just gets worse. Actually, one more thing - Mrs. Dudley in this movie isn't nearly as scary as in the original. When Mrs. Dudley says the famous line "In the night...in the dark" for a second time, Eleanor actually finishes the sentence for her. By Eleanor doing this, it destroys and cheapens one of the classic lines from the original movie. Basically, Eleanor is making fun of Mrs. Dudley's sentence instead of being frightened or concerned about it. I also notice that the characters seem thin, like they lack depth. They're just sort of there, saying their lines from a bad script that was given to them. They look like they don't know what to do half the time. It's equivalent to teenagers from a slasher film who are just set up to be killed by a psycho stalker. No character development. And what's with the argument between Zeta-Jones and Neeson? Very weird. And it even turns physical.
Hill House looks more like a gothic castle than a haunted mansion, and it's HUGE. I don't know how anybody can actually live there. The place is humongous. The fireplace looks like it would devour anybody who goes near it. The doors in the place seem like they're 20 feet high. Everything in this movie is BIG, OVERDONE, and OBVIOUS compared to the original.
Black and white is the way to go for a movie like this. In the original movie, Robert Wise brilliantly used black and white with unique camera angles and shadows to create a haunted atmosphere. In this remake, color was used and it ruins the atmosphere. And the CGI effects? Totally cheesy and funny. I was laughing throughout most of the movie, saying, "What IS this?" When you try to make radical changes to a classic, forget it. You've already struck out. In this movie, you actually SEE the ghosts. They also appear in weird, contorted forms and all shapes and sizes, even underneath curtains, bed sheets, and a fist through a door. Weird. And funny. This movie is pretty much like watching Scooby Doo (fun and frights combined), except Scooby Doo is more frightening. You didn't see the ghosts in the original movie. You just knew they were there. It's what you can't see that is so scary. That's how it should be.
A skeleton that comes alive? This stuff is straight out of a homemade basement haunted house made by 8-year olds.
The lesbian relations between Eleanor and Theo is more apparent and obvious in this movie than in the original. This movie leaves nothing to the imagination. Obvious lesbian relations, obvious ghosts, obvious haunts, etc. Upon their first meeting, it takes Theo a matter of seconds to let Eleanor know she's a lesbian. She basically "came out" as soon as she met Eleanor. In the original the lesbianism was more implied than obvious. It left the viewer to wonder if it existed at all.
I find it interesting that this remake was made 36 years after the original came out. Usually when remakes are done, it's 20, 25, 30, 40, 50 years later. In this situation, it was an oddball 36 years later, in 1999. Maybe the makers of this movie were afraid that Y2K would prevent them from using their beloved CGI effects, so they made the movie an oddball 36 years after the original and released it in 1999, months before the December 31, 1999 Y2K concern! I'm joking, but you never know...
If you like the classic original movie from 1963, don't bother with this 1999 remake. Terrible. It should be renamed The Humorous Haunting Of Humongous Hill House. If Shirley Jackson was still around I wonder what she would think of this disaster of a movie. 1 star.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
A Wanting Haunting
Added 10/25/2009
This film recycles every haunted house cliche from the black-and-white movie era, and the tone of the movie often veers into camp (especially with Lili Taylor's performance). The back story is muddied and incoherent too. It's a shame that with such a large budget for special effects and with so many talented actors, The Haunting doesn't generate more thrills for the audience.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
Awesome movie!
Added 8/6/2009
Great movie for the home theater system.
Make sure you get the DTS version!
Highly recommended!
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
Promises alot. Delivers little.
Added 7/20/2009
I was really stoked to watch this movie. And I honestly enjoyed the first half of the it - the setup. I love the actors here. The look and feel of the picture was great, dug the vibe. A bunch of strangers come together for an insomnia experiment in a haunted house in New England. The Dr, Liam Neeson hasn't told them that he wants to study their reaction to fear. They stay in the house a couple of days and it begins to have an effect on them. Lili Taylor's charactor in particular.
That's about as far as I can go w/o spoilage. I'll just say it becomes predictable haunted house story after that. I didn't get the thrills I was expecting. Such interesting characters. Such potential. I've rarely seen a movie that was such a let down.
1 out of 1 people found this helpful.
|
The Haunting
Added 2/6/2010
Eleanor Lance is called to meet at Hill House for Dr. Marrow's sleeping disorder studies, along with three other people. The owners of the house tell them that no one will be around and that they won't be able to hear them. The first night they all sit around and talk. Eleanor tells them that her sleeping disorder is different because she can sleep it is just that she wakes up because she thinks her dead mom is still living with her. Well that isn't the case now because she is woken one night in the Hill House bedroom by talking childrens voices asking her for her help. At first scared by the voice, she learns to avoid them. Later, the group finds out that Dr. Marrow is not using them for sleeping disorders but a test in fear. The fear is first thought to be fake but eventually turns real when loud noises are heard and objects start to move. Now they must try an escape the house before they are all killed. I enjoyed it. The acting is good and there are moments that make you jump.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
The Humorous Haunting Of Humongous Hill House. A pointless remake of a classic
Added 1/6/2010
The Haunting is a movie originally made in 1963, based on Shirley Jackson's novel The Haunting Of Hill House. The story is about four paranormal investigators who spend time at Hill House, a 90-year old mansion in New England that is said to be haunted. During their stay, they find out over time that the house really is haunted. The house seems alive and it wants to keep one of the investigators, Eleanor, in the house.
Fast forward 36 years to 1999. A remake was made.
I watched this 1999 remake of The Haunting on YouTube from start to finish. I had never seen it before tonight. I definitely wasn't missing anything (except maybe Lili Taylor's good looks). This was a pointless remake of the classic 1963 original and it fails on all levels. Robert Wise got it right in 1963!!!!!!!!!!! This 1999 remake? It's equivalent to trying to remake The Wizard Of Oz. Better yet, I felt like I was watching an elementary school play called The Haunting, except the actors were adults. Don't mess with the classics, that's what I say. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Too often, the movie makers fall all over themselves when they remake classic movies. But we all know the real motivation behind the remake$. It's $$$$$. They always say it's to introduce the young people of today to old classic movies. My philosophy is this: Just show them the original!!!! But noooooooooo, they've got to throw in the CGI special effects, otherwise boredom will set in on the young audience. And they MUST be color movies. No black and white - that's a no-no.
What's wrong with this movie? EVERYTHING! This movie compared to the original is like comparing apples and oranges. First of all, the story was completely massacred. It's so different than the original, but every once in a while you'll hear a familiar line from the original. Very weird. Secondly, the movie is in color. Color isn't nearly as effective as black and white for this type of movie. Of course the movies of today are going to be in color, but if you're going to remake The Haunting at all, give at least SOME consideration to shooting in black and white. The acting for the most part is wooden. The actors in this 1999 movie don't come anywhere near the actors in the 1963 original in acting ability and screen presence. Catherine Zeta-Jones (who plays Theo) has an air about her that suggests that she thinks she's so sexy. This is the character she's playing. Unfortunately, she's not nearly as good as Claire Bloom from the original. Lili Taylor (who plays Eleanor) tries hard but falls short of the performance of Julie Harris. To me, Lili looks like a young Jamie Lee Curtis. Liam Neeson isn't nearly as good as Richard Johnson in the role of Dr. John Markway or whatever his name is in this remake. And he looks bored and totally out of place, like he's just going through the motions and collecting his paycheck. Owen Wilson is no Russ Tamblyn. Those pajamas are, well, funny. And what's with the "carnival" room that spins around? Hill House seems like it's a haunted attraction and an amusement park rolled into one. I'll stop there, because it just gets worse. Actually, one more thing - Mrs. Dudley in this movie isn't nearly as scary as in the original. When Mrs. Dudley says the famous line "In the night...in the dark" for a second time, Eleanor actually finishes the sentence for her. By Eleanor doing this, it destroys and cheapens one of the classic lines from the original movie. Basically, Eleanor is making fun of Mrs. Dudley's sentence instead of being frightened or concerned about it. I also notice that the characters seem thin, like they lack depth. They're just sort of there, saying their lines from a bad script that was given to them. They look like they don't know what to do half the time. It's equivalent to teenagers from a slasher film who are just set up to be killed by a psycho stalker. No character development. And what's with the argument between Zeta-Jones and Neeson? Very weird. And it even turns physical.
Hill House looks more like a gothic castle than a haunted mansion, and it's HUGE. I don't know how anybody can actually live there. The place is humongous. The fireplace looks like it would devour anybody who goes near it. The doors in the place seem like they're 20 feet high. Everything in this movie is BIG, OVERDONE, and OBVIOUS compared to the original.
Black and white is the way to go for a movie like this. In the original movie, Robert Wise brilliantly used black and white with unique camera angles and shadows to create a haunted atmosphere. In this remake, color was used and it ruins the atmosphere. And the CGI effects? Totally cheesy and funny. I was laughing throughout most of the movie, saying, "What IS this?" When you try to make radical changes to a classic, forget it. You've already struck out. In this movie, you actually SEE the ghosts. They also appear in weird, contorted forms and all shapes and sizes, even underneath curtains, bed sheets, and a fist through a door. Weird. And funny. This movie is pretty much like watching Scooby Doo (fun and frights combined), except Scooby Doo is more frightening. You didn't see the ghosts in the original movie. You just knew they were there. It's what you can't see that is so scary. That's how it should be.
A skeleton that comes alive? This stuff is straight out of a homemade basement haunted house made by 8-year olds.
The lesbian relations between Eleanor and Theo is more apparent and obvious in this movie than in the original. This movie leaves nothing to the imagination. Obvious lesbian relations, obvious ghosts, obvious haunts, etc. Upon their first meeting, it takes Theo a matter of seconds to let Eleanor know she's a lesbian. She basically "came out" as soon as she met Eleanor. In the original the lesbianism was more implied than obvious. It left the viewer to wonder if it existed at all.
I find it interesting that this remake was made 36 years after the original came out. Usually when remakes are done, it's 20, 25, 30, 40, 50 years later. In this situation, it was an oddball 36 years later, in 1999. Maybe the makers of this movie were afraid that Y2K would prevent them from using their beloved CGI effects, so they made the movie an oddball 36 years after the original and released it in 1999, months before the December 31, 1999 Y2K concern! I'm joking, but you never know...
If you like the classic original movie from 1963, don't bother with this 1999 remake. Terrible. It should be renamed The Humorous Haunting Of Humongous Hill House. If Shirley Jackson was still around I wonder what she would think of this disaster of a movie. 1 star.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
A Wanting Haunting
Added 10/25/2009
This film recycles every haunted house cliche from the black-and-white movie era, and the tone of the movie often veers into camp (especially with Lili Taylor's performance). The back story is muddied and incoherent too. It's a shame that with such a large budget for special effects and with so many talented actors, The Haunting doesn't generate more thrills for the audience.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
