Compellingly flawed
Added 9/16/2009
The Bottom Line:
Salvador has a whole bunch of things wrong with it but the central character, as essayed by James Woods, is an absolutely fascinating character--a journalist with the ethos of a lovable con man--and the film manages to always be interesting even when its erratic pacing or on-again off-again plot threaten to sabotage the movie; it's not as polished as Oliver Stone's other 1986 film (the one that won Best Picture), but I guarantee the character of Richard Boyle will stay with you.
3/4
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
bad copy of movie
Added 7/1/2009
the movie itself was a good documentary of the civil strife in El Salvador back in the 80s. However, the copy I purchased had some problems and I was unable to see the end.....
0 out of 2 people found this helpful.
|
A betrayal to it's namesake
Added 3/9/2009
If you are looking to watch a film to tell you the story of life in Salvador during war times... this is not a good choice. If you are looking for good acting... this is not a good choice. It you are looking to watch a demeaning, distant, ignorant, fake, and lame attmept at teling a story... then this is a film for you.
Watch Romero instead.
0 out of 5 people found this helpful.
|
James Woods at his Best
Added 2/23/2009
Absolutely amazing performances by both James Woods and co-star Jim Belushi. Viewing this movie 23 years after its original release was, for me, as riveting and enjoyable as the first time. I have seen and enjoyed most of his performances and still believe this to be his finest. If you are a fan of his, don't miss it! So real, excellent photography, wonderful script, believable actors.
0 out of 0 people found this helpful.
|
Thumbs down
Added 12/11/2007
I found it full of stereotypes and did not like it at all. I would not recommend anybody to watch this movie.
0 out of 6 people found this helpful.
|